What We Talk About When We Talk About Force Sensitivity

David Bernat
7 min readMay 8, 2024

Imagine a machine that can tingle your brain into that sense of curiosity. What would you want to learn from this machine?

I found myself at a table several weeks ago talking with a growing neuro-bio-immunologist researcher, which is one of those academic profession names that reads as though the National Science Foundation makes names up to seem more important than they are while keeping all our tax dollars, describing how an algebraic reading machine could identify teaching need.

Any subject in a textbook — and subject at all, really — can be decomposed into fifty elemental forms of knowledge that a reader needs to comprehend before understanding the subject material, and other algorithms can find which twelve or twenty or forty-two elemental skills the reader presently does or does not know about the subject material, then simply guide the reader — or the reading material, if we are using a generating algorithm to write — to the remaining elemental skills before expecting understanding.

Reading comprehension of a skill can be measured algorithmically in a lot of different ways — and there are entire departments called Pedagogy that study the learning of learning (more tax dollars wasted) — and nowadays everything from a reader scroll speed to their propensity to shift over to a search engine or click a link can eventually calculate up a skills repository. I am speaking overtly here but in other documents I have specified, and talked to people who know such expertise, how it can be done really fast*.

Now, what would you want yourself to be taught from this magic system?

When I was younger, I wanted to learn Quantum Mechanics because that was the defining information system of the Twentieth Century. Nowadays, Nanotechnology remain on my “for Dummies” table of sciences to learn, because I feel the transformations of nanotechnology are will be profound and that their growth aligns best with the transformations that will be necessary to move the U.S. economies away from their Militarized and Imperialized entrenched past: back in the early months of 2020 when I began saying this I would use the example of the corridor of North New Jersey where former mid-Century weapons chemical factories now churn out artificial banana flavoring; with the quietest of unspoken assumptions and management that should the United States ever find itself in a hot war of chemical manufacturing those assemblages of factories could be pivoted back into co-alignment to build what its U.S. Defense Protection Act needs*.

I became embedded in my interests for engineering great things during this same time because naturally when you transform machinery and materials you transform scale, possibility, and engineering: rocketry was first for me, and I had this wild idea that I could out-compete Elon Musk on his own turf and by the end of 2020 when Starship SN8 blew up on its launchpad landing I was discomfortingly thrilled to discover I would definitely replace Musk.

When I became a little more Confident in what this machine could and could not do, I realized early that somebody was going to be fascinated by what could be deduced from classified documents redacted decades ago, and that I should probably focus on that as the frontier of national security.

A machinery exists to tingle our brain into learning whatever we want, and my expertise in these industries allows me to ascertain precisely how little information targeted is required to access extraordinarily exponential results: by the end of 2019 I had taken to calling these civilization advancing technologies, and defined them specifically as technology transformations so great that the political and geo-global political structures did not yet exist, and were hard to communicate, and that by definition the era of AI would be defined by these rapidity arising surprises to the geo-global substrates. Which really, really emphasizes those selections of interests that I describe above.

Because society advancing technologies themselves become exponential then.

Again.
Imagine a machine that can tingle your brain into that sense of curiosity. What would you want to learn from this machine?

The Sorrows of Energizing Brie Larson

“Does my spouse love me?” was never requested as a machinery wall to be created to exponentiate nothing.

Israel decided that instead of allowing the United States to operate as a Free and Just society with its two new standard bearers barnstorming into 2021, that the same technology could be mechanically constructed to answer the most important question of all of our human invention and ingenuity: does the person I want to love me genuinely love me; and do we want to marry?

For the interest of narrative of the future I will keep a consistent flow of how those readers should emotionally feel as they are reading these pages; however, the same strings of the same sweaters resolve to the same evildoers. That video was published two days after Larson and Bernat pivot.

For instance, that photograph on the left of the non-plussed yet-ever-so-🧚 was published robotically with the caption “London magic” from the Brie Larson Instagram account the moment I stepped out of the Barnes & Noble in Montgomery, PA, in which I had bought those children’s books that I use for the LawyerAPI [REDACTED] technology of unmasking national secrets, and shortly after I wrote a short generative AI treatise named Destination: Moon for my future wife. In other words, here in one singular moment, I am making a purchase of children’s books on topical material for my LLC so that I have case studies of material to write for children when my LLC begins to unearth national security secrets while stationing myself at the store to draft two pages of generative AI seed writing for a movie and its congruent program management into Google Docs named Destination: Moon. It all is a complete program: down to the word choices in the story, the quotations from Buzz Aldrin, the protagonist name Skip Roberts, and the small LEGO vehicle published by LEGO Inc. to accompany its Galactic Travelers series; its (my LLC) choice of Google Docs, specific photographs that I had taken within the store, the topics of those specific children’s books, which tie to the financial models, which allows for the concurrent unrolling of program management in the future to go along with schedules of its episode that its generative seeds could be used to write in Hollywood.

For my wife.

Who could certainly be Brie Larson.

Wouldn’t my wife have tuned her machine?

For our children.

For the children of my wife with me.

For the financial models.

My LLC has already validated.

Before I went to the Barnes & Nobel.

To buy the books.

To write the generative AI seed.

To program manage the Future.

Using Google Docs and the Moon.

For the Gemini program.

For which LEGO has validated its existence.

For the road trip.

Which is the Honeymoon.

And has absolutely nothing to do with London Magic.

Or Elijah Blitz.

Or my purchases being tracked to Israel or my camera or my Google Doc.

But certainly has something to do with

One non-plussed Brie Larson in a willow field in London with 🧚 lighting.

So.

Get the [expletive] out of the way of myself and my wife.

Whomever she may be.

However she has tuned her machine.

Because Love.

Is the program of its entanglement.

THE GOOD ENDING. INCL. STARLIGHT ACADEMY BY STARLIGHT LLC. ALSO: THAT IS ME DRESSED AS JOHN F. KENNEDY IN EARLY JANUARY 2020. THIS IS MINE.

Posted at 11:17AM on May 8th, 2024 by David Bernat. Typed manually.

Appendix

*An astute reader of Bernatology will recognize that Hillary Clinton is a war monger of the Middle East; at least one journalist at the New York Times can recognize this with intuitive profundity, and the President of the United States can confirm — while the President of the United States can suddenly recognize that Hillary Clinton used his wife against him during an election year to cover herself and Obama from warcrimes and Russia. Incredible!

That is Force Sensitivity.

And a tribute to Samuel L. Jackson: because unless you are Ronald Reagan, or an actor-to-President, you are an avatar for a President if you are talented.

*One could even imagine using this machine to generate all new vaccines. Though that would be problematic for numerous civil and private reasons.

*Future update will include an original intention of this article which is to gain Force Sensitivity for reading the news when to push on articulating specific cases of national security and public interest, including through politics. Starlight LLC will retcon Force Sensitivity away from midichlorians. Force Sensitivity will remaining having a heredity factor.

--

--

David Bernat

Starlight. Making better satellite analytics possible.